OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Sweden's goal was correctly allowed. A Swedish player was initially in an offside position when the free kick was struck from Tunisia's left side, but a teammate deliberately touched the ball in the middle of the play before it reached the goal scorer. Under the Laws of the Game, this touch by the intervening teammate resets the offside assessment — it's treated as a new phase of play. From that moment onward, the goal scorer's position is measured against the defensive line as of the teammate's touch, not the original free kick. VAR properly applied this principle and confirmed the goal was legitimate.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion