Was that call right?

Upload any football clip and get an AI Video Assistant Referee verdict, grounded in the IFAB Laws of the Game. Frame-by-frame reasoning, confidence rating, and law citation on every decision.

๐Ÿค” Suggest a controversy

60-second verdict ยท IFAB-grounded on every call ยท Try it on any clip

185
Cases analysed
73%
AI accuracy
11
Languages
IFAB
Grounded in the Laws

What we do here

  1. 1 We grade every major football controversy against the IFAB Laws of the Game โ€” week in, week out.
  2. 2 Each verdict cites the exact Law, names the call we'd have made, and explains the reasoning frame by frame.
  3. 3 You vote, debate, and shape the consensus. Verdicts that cross the threshold become precedents the AI uses on similar calls.

What makes it different

IFAB-grounded

Every verdict cites Law 11, 12, or 14 โ€” not vibes. Reasoning is built from the actual text of the rules in force the season the match was played.

Frame-by-frame

The AI describes what it sees in each frame and grounds the verdict in visible evidence. If the contact isn't visible, it says so.

10 languages

Read verdicts in English, German, Portuguese, Spanish, French, Italian, Turkish, Arabic, Korean, or Japanese โ€” translated on demand.

Community precedents

Cases confirmed by the community become precedents the next analysis can reference. The library learns from every verified call.

Any clip source

Paste an X clip, a Reddit post, or upload a file โ€” we handle codecs, framing, and trimming. No prep work.

Public verdict library

Every analyzed call lands in a searchable library โ€” by referee, team, competition. Spot patterns, not one-offs.

PRICING

Plans that grow with the season

Every verdict is free to read. Paid tiers unlock deeper features for the fans who go beyond reading.

  • Forensic-mode breakdowns + side-by-side comparisons
  • Priority on your suggested controversies
  • Ad-free browsing + early access to new features

Paid plans from โ‚ฌ3.99/month ยท no card needed to start

Compare plans โ†’