OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Spain were awarded and scored a penalty when France's Digne raised his boot high and kicked Yamal inside the box; the dispute was a possible handball by Yamal just before. This is correct. Digne's dangerously high boot catching the man is a clear foul and a penalty. The arm contact does not rescue France: an attacker's accidental handball only cancels an award when the handball itself creates the chance, and here the chance came from Digne's kick, not Yamal's arm — so only a deliberate handball would have negated it. VAR checked and upheld it. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence — it flips to WRONG only if Yamal deliberately handled or used his arm to control before the foul.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion