OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct (No Call). You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Cucurella briefly covered his mouth while speaking near Messi, who demanded a red card; the referee gave nothing. This is a correct no-call. Covering the mouth is not itself an offence — a sending-off requires offensive, insulting or abusive language, and the referee judged no such exchange took place. The gesture only matters if there is a genuine confrontation or abusive words, and an opponent's demand for a card does not manufacture one. CORRECT NO-CALL, medium confidence — it rests on the finding that no abusive words were exchanged.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion