OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
A Spain goal by Nico Williams was disallowed after a VAR check for a Merino foul in the build-up. This is correct. Merino committed a clear foul on an opponent moments before the goal, and a goal cannot stand when a clear build-up foul by the attacking side precedes it. The bar to chalk off a goal is a clear-and-obvious foul, not a soft one, and this contact is clear. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence — it would flip only if the contact were soft or the opponent initiated it.
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion