OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Partially Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Olise slid in late on a Spain player and caught his ankle; the referee gave a free kick but no card, while some demanded a straight red. This is partially correct. The foul is right, and a late challenge catching an opponent's ankle is reckless, which is a caution — so the referee under-sanctioned by missing the yellow. But it is not a red: the challenge is of moderate force and mistimed, not the excessive-force, safety-endangering intensity that serious foul play requires. PARTIALLY CORRECT, medium confidence — the missed element is a yellow, it flips to CORRECT DECISION if read as merely careless, and it is not a red on any reading.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion