1 / 2 today Sign up free →
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #123

Uruguay vs Cape Verde

FIFA World Cup · 2025/2026 · 2026-06-21 · 2-2

Correct high confidence
Offside
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 4 votes needed for verdict
Incident
Offside
Law cited
Law 11 — Offside
Recommended action
Goal correctly disallowed
Referee
Affected team
On-field decision
Goal disallowed for offside; SAOT confirmed Uruguay attacker was off the field and treated as on the goal line under Law 11
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

Uruguay scored from a corner-kick phase, but the goal was disallowed for an offside that almost nobody outside the laws-of-the-game crowd has ever seen applied. A Uruguay attacker (#20) had stepped off the field over the byline during / immediately after the corner — without the referee's permission. Under Law 11, a player who leaves the field of play without permission is treated as being on the goal line for offside purposes until the next stoppage or until the defending team plays the ball toward the halfway line. The goal line is the deepest possible position on the field, so by legal fiction the Uruguay attacker was further forward than every Cape Verde defender, including the last defender near the post. When he became active in the move that produced the goal, that was an offside offence. The assistant referee raised the flag immediately, SAOT confirmed the position, the goal was chalked off. Bizarre on first look, technically correct on a careful read of Law 11.

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion