OURVARは審判の判定を「正しい」と分析しました。あなたが投票するのは、OURVARの分析が正しいかどうかです。審判への投票ではありません。
OURVARの判定に同意しますか?
すべての投票がOURVARの精度向上に役立っています — そのご協力に心より感謝します。AIは完璧ではなく、皆さんの判定こそがケースごとの改善につながります。私たちが求めるVARを、一緒に作り上げていきましょう。🙏
Iran were awarded a penalty against Egypt, given on field and confirmed by VAR. In the build-up, an Egypt player (No. 6, Abdelmonem) was in possession in his own box; an Iran player got a touch on the ball, and the Egyptian — continuing his motion, by his own account without noticing — kicked the Iranian on the foot. The penalty is soft but correct. Under Law 12, kicking an opponent carelessly is a direct-free-kick offence, and "careless" explicitly covers acting without sufficient attention — i.e. kicking him without meaning to. Intent is not required, and being the player in possession does not grant immunity from fouling the challenger. A careless kick on an opponent inside the penalty area is a penalty. The contact was minimal, so a stricter referee could have treated it as trifling and waved it on — but the on-field referee judged it a foul and VAR confirmed, which places it on the correct, if soft, side of the line. CORRECT DECISION, MEDIUM confidence.
重要ポイント、引用されたIFAB競技規則、判定に至るまでのフレーム毎の解説をすべて見るには登録してください。
判定に異議を唱えよう。OURVARに「なぜ?」「肘の角度は?」「前例は?」と質問し、ケースを分析した同じモデルからIFAB規則に基づいた回答を受け取れます。Pro 25/月 · WC 50 · GB 150.
ディスカッション