OURVAR가 심판의 판정을 분석했습니다: 정확. 지금 투표는 심판이 아닌 OURVAR의 분석이 옳은지에 대한 것입니다.
OURVAR의 판정에 동의하시나요?
모든 투표는 OURVAR의 정확도를 높이는 데 도움이 됩니다 — 그리고 저희는 진심으로 감사드립니다. AI는 완벽하지 않으며, 여러분의 판단이 바로 사례 하나하나를 개선하는 원동력입니다. 우리 모두가 원하는 VAR을 함께 만들어가고 있습니다. 🙏
Deep in stoppage time with Iran leading Egypt 2-1, Iran's #4 scored from a rebound but the goal was disallowed after a VAR offside check. The decision is correct. Offside is assessed at the moment the ball is last played by a teammate — here, the original shot. #4 was in an offside position at that moment (confirmed by semi-automated offside technology). The ball then rebounded off the goalkeeper / post / a deflection before #4 scored. Crucially, a rebound off the goalkeeper (a save) or the woodwork does NOT reset an attacker's offside — the player remains offside from the original phase. Offside only resets when a defender DELIBERATELY plays the ball (a controlled action, not a save or deflection), which did not happen here. So #4 became an active offside player by scoring the rebound, which is an offside offence. CORRECT DECISION, HIGH confidence — the goal was rightly chalked off. Note: offside is judged against the second-last defender (the last is usually the goalkeeper). The line here is set by #9; the keeper is deeper and off-screen. #4 is ahead of #9 → offside.
모든 핵심 요인, 인용된 IFAB 법령 조항, 그리고 이 판정에 이른 프레임별 추론을 보려면 가입하세요.
판정에 의문을 제기하세요. "왜?", "팔꿈치 각도는?", "전례는?"을 OURVAR에 물어보고 — 사건을 분석한 동일한 모델로부터 IFAB 규정에 근거한 답을 받으세요. Pro 25/월 · WC 50 · GB 150.
토론