OURVAR가 심판의 판정을 분석했습니다: 정확. 지금 투표는 심판이 아닌 OURVAR의 분석이 옳은지에 대한 것입니다.
OURVAR의 판정에 동의하시나요?
모든 투표는 OURVAR의 정확도를 높이는 데 도움이 됩니다 — 그리고 저희는 진심으로 감사드립니다. AI는 완벽하지 않으며, 여러분의 판단이 바로 사례 하나하나를 개선하는 원동력입니다. 우리 모두가 원하는 VAR을 함께 만들어가고 있습니다. 🙏
Ghana equalised against Croatia at 1-1, and after the celebrations the assistant referee flagged for offside, sending the referee to the monitor for nearly four minutes. The goal was correctly given. The decision turns on the most misunderstood principle in Law 11: being in an offside position is NOT an offence. A player is only penalised if he is in an offside position AND becomes involved in active play — by touching the ball, by interfering with an opponent (blocking the goalkeeper's sight or movement, challenging a defender), or by gaining an advantage from a rebound. Here, two things make the goal valid: first, the player who actually scored was ONSIDE; second, Ghana's #8, who was in an offside position, did not touch the ball and did not interfere with any opponent. As the referee stated: "The attacker number 8 was in an offside position, but he did not interfere with play. Decision is goal for Ghana." An offside-positioned teammate who stays passive and out of the play does not invalidate a goal scored by an onside player. CORRECT DECISION, HIGH confidence — and the long check reflects the referee correctly verifying both the scorer's position and whether #8 became active.
모든 핵심 요인, 인용된 IFAB 법령 조항, 그리고 이 판정에 이른 프레임별 추론을 보려면 가입하세요.
판정에 의문을 제기하세요. "왜?", "팔꿈치 각도는?", "전례는?"을 OURVAR에 물어보고 — 사건을 분석한 동일한 모델로부터 IFAB 규정에 근거한 답을 받으세요. Pro 25/월 · WC 50 · GB 150.
토론