OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Wrong. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Romania attacked down the pitch and played a pass to a player in the Wales half around the 25-minute mark. The on-field referee immediately flagged for offside and disallowed the goal. However, when examined frame-by-frame, the Romania player receiving the ball appears to be level with or only marginally ahead of Wales's last outfield defender (the "second-last opponent" in offside terminology) at the moment the ball was played. Under Law 11, a player level with the second-last defender is not in an offside position and may legally receive and play the ball. The referee's decision to disallow the goal was incorrect—the goal should have stood.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion