Você concorda com o veredicto do OURVAR?
Turkey #11 hit a shot or cross that struck an Australia player's arm inside (or near) the penalty area. From the footage, the Australia player's arm was extended outward from the body at the moment of contact — not tucked in naturally — which under IFAB Law 12 constitutes a handball offence because the arm was in an unnatural position making the body bigger. The referee allowed play to continue without awarding a penalty, and no VAR check was made. By the strict IFAB standard, this should have been a penalty kick to Turkey, making the no-call a wrong decision. Turkey #11 was visibly furious with the call, as seen in the final frames.
Leia a análise completa da OURVAR
Cadastre-se para ver cada ponto-chave, as cláusulas das Leis IFAB citadas e o raciocínio quadro a quadro que levou a este veredito.
- Pontos-chave que orientaram a decisão da IA
- Citações completas das Leis IFAB + referências de quadros
- Vote, comente e discuta com outros fãs
Pergunte à OURVAR
Alguma dúvida sobre este veredito?
Questione o veredito. Pergunte ao OURVAR "por quê?", "e o ângulo do cotovelo?", "qual o precedente?" — e receba respostas fundamentadas nas Leis da IFAB do mesmo modelo que analisou o lance. Pro 25/mês · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussão