OURVARは審判の判定を「正しい」と分析しました。あなたが投票するのは、OURVARの分析が正しいかどうかです。審判への投票ではありません。
OURVARの判定に同意しますか?
すべての投票がOURVARの精度向上に役立っています — そのご協力に心より感謝します。AIは完璧ではなく、皆さんの判定こそがケースごとの改善につながります。私たちが求めるVARを、一緒に作り上げていきましょう。🙏
Deep in stoppage time with Ecuador losing 2-0 to Mexico, Ecuador's Hincapié covered his mouth during a face-to-face confrontation with a Mexican opponent. The Mexican alerted the referee, VAR reviewed it as a possible red card, and Hincapié was sent off. The decision is correct. Under a measure IFAB approved in April 2026 and the World Cup adopted, a player who covers their mouth in a confrontational situation with an opponent may be shown a red card. The rule exists because covering the mouth in an argument is used to hide offensive, insulting, abusive or discriminatory speech from officials and broadcast lip-readers — and both are sending-off offences under Law 12. Because the whole point is concealment, the referee does not need to prove the exact words: the gesture in a confrontation is what's sanctioned. This is also why VAR's involvement fits perfectly — the concealment gesture is visible on camera even when the words are not audible, so VAR can flag it. None of the legitimate exceptions apply here (this was not medical, not a sneeze, not tactical communication to a teammate, not after the exchange had ended) — it was a hand over the mouth while confronting an opponent. CORRECT DECISION, high confidence. The one qualifier: this is a competition-organiser measure, so it is a red because the World Cup adopted it; in a competition that had not opted in, it would not be an offence.
重要ポイント、引用されたIFAB競技規則、判定に至るまでのフレーム毎の解説をすべて見るには登録してください。
判定に異議を唱えよう。OURVARに「なぜ?」「肘の角度は?」「前例は?」と質問し、ケースを分析した同じモデルからIFAB規則に基づいた回答を受け取れます。Pro 25/月 · WC 50 · GB 150.
ディスカッション