3 / 3 today Sign up free β†’
Goal / no-goal
πŸ—³οΈ Community verdict β€” vote now 5 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β€” not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β€” and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. πŸ™

Incident
Goal / no-goal
Law cited
Law 12 β€” Handball
Recommended action
Goal stands β€” no handball offence under 2025/26 Law 12
Affected team
On-field decision
Goal allowed
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it β€” we review every submission.
Suggest a clip β†’

Manchester United #19's arm contact with the ball in the penalty area was assessed as accidental β€” no deliberate movement of arm toward ball visible in frames 2–4

πŸ”’ Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

πŸ”’ PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β€” and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest β€” one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free β†’