1 / 3 today
βš– VAR Verdict Β· Case #102

Haiti vs Scotland

FIFA World Cup Β· 2025/2026 Β· 2026-06-13 Β· 0-1

Correct medium confidence
Red card β€” serious foul play
πŸ—³οΈ Community verdict β€” vote now 4 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β€” not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β€” and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. πŸ™

Incident
Red card β€” serious foul play
Law cited
Law 12 β€” Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Yellow card to Scotland player β€” reckless challenge, not excessive force
Affected team
On-field decision
Yellow card shown
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it β€” we review every submission.
Suggest a clip β†’

The referee showed a yellow card to the Scotland player (red kit) for a reckless high-boot challenge on a Haiti player (white kit) near the touchline. Reviewing the frames, the Scotland player does raise his foot to a concerning height with studs visible while both players contest the ball β€” that's undeniably reckless and deserving of a caution. However, to upgrade to a red card for serious foul play, the challenge must cross into excessive force or clearly endangering the opponent's safety: the frames show both players were genuinely going for a contested aerial ball, there is no visible uncontrolled lunge or dangerous follow-through, and the contact height, while elevated, sits at approximately knee level rather than clearly above. The yellow card is the correct punishment under IFAB Law 12 β€” reckless, yes; excessive force that endangers safety, not clearly established here.

πŸ”’ Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

πŸ”’ PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β€” and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest β€” one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free β†’