OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
In the dying minutes of Uruguay vs Spain (Uruguay losing 0-1), Cannobio launched a two-footed lunging challenge at full speed into a Spain player and was shown a straight red card. The decision is correct. Under Law 12, serious foul play is defined by the MANNER of the challenge — a lunge using one or both legs with excessive force or endangering the safety of an opponent — not by the outcome. A two-footed challenge at full speed endangers the opponent's safety the instant it is committed, so whether it made full contact, partial contact, or the opponent pulled away to avoid it is irrelevant. The fact that he "didn't fully hit" the Spaniard does not mitigate it. This is a clear sending-off for serious foul play. CORRECT DECISION, HIGH confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion