OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
The referee correctly waved away contact involving Mbappé in the box, judging it insufficient for a foul under Law 12. VAR recommended an on-field review, the referee reviewed the footage, and confirmed his original non-decision — no penalty kick. Under the modern VAR protocol the final on-field decision (after review) is the verdict being graded: that final decision was "no PK," and it was right. Light coming-together contact during a running duel doesn't meet the careless / reckless / excessive-force threshold of Law 12, and VAR is explicit that the on-field call stands unless evidence is clear and obvious of an error. Neither condition was present here.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion