OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
A Qatar player challenged a Canadian opponent with such force that the Canadian was left on the ground unable to get up — visible across multiple frames from the 50th minute onward — with the submitter reporting a broken leg. VAR reviewed the initial call and upgraded it to a red card for serious foul play, the most severe category of foul under Law 12, reserved for challenges that use excessive force or endanger the safety of an opponent. A challenge that results in a fracture is the clearest possible evidence that the force threshold was crossed. The red card is the correct decision, and no other player in the visible footage committed a separately sanctionable act.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion