OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. π
Bosnia and Herzegovina defender MuharemoviΔ (#7 in red) was correctly sent off after sliding in on a Switzerland attacker who had broken clear with space to advance toward goal and no covering defender between him and the keeper. All four conditions for Denying an Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity (DOGSO) under Law 12 were met β the attacker had control of the ball, was heading toward goal, and the challenge took him rather than the ball. The free kick to Switzerland and the red card are both the right calls under the Laws of the Game.
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.
Discussion