OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Late in a goalless game, a Colombia attacker went down under a Switzerland defender's challenge in the box with some arm/shirt contact; no penalty was given and VAR stayed out. This is defensible. The contact reads as marginal, not a clear sustained hold, and a two-way tangle is not automatically a foul — a marginal appeal is not the clear-and-obvious error VAR overturns. It flips to a penalty only if a replay shows a clear, sustained pull. The same referee waved Switzerland's appeal at the other end — one bar, both ways. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion