OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Spain scored in stoppage time (93:05 +6) but the goal was correctly disallowed for offside on manual review. The Spain attacker was clearly past Saudi Arabia's last defender — well beyond the "borderline cm" zone — at the moment the ball was last played by a team-mate. SAOT was unavailable for the match, so the VAR team relied on hand-traced lines, but a clear-and-obvious offside doesn't need technology to resolve: the broadcast angle alone shows the gap. The "clear and obvious error" VAR threshold for overturning the on-field goal was met, and the manual overturn was the right call. Score correctly reverted from 5-0 to 4-0.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion