OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Approximately 20 seconds before Argentina's Messi goal, Argentina #20 contested possession with Austria #4 in a shoulder-to-shoulder challenge near midfield. The Austrian went to ground; the on-field referee — viewing the contact from point-blank range via the REF cam — judged it a fair challenge and waved play on. Argentina retained possession in a continuous attacking move that ended with Messi's finish. Because possession was continuous from the contact to the goal, the challenge was inside the Attacking Possession Phase (APP) and was reviewable by VAR. VAR ran the standard silent goal-check, reviewed the available angles, and concluded the on-field no-call was correct — no clear and obvious error. The challenge reads as a legitimate 50/50 shoulder contest, not a careless or reckless foul under Law 12. Both the on-field referee and VAR independently agreed: no foul, goal stands. CORRECT DECISION, HIGH confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion