OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Wrong (No Call). You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
At 79' with France leading Iraq 3-0, Mbappé took the ball down the right channel and engaged Iraqi defender Aimar (#20) in a 1v1 inside the penalty area. Mbappé nutmegged the defender — the ball was played between the Iraqi's legs and past him, out of his reach to legally contest. Instead of turning to chase the ball or simply giving way, the defender held his position blocking Mbappé's running path AND deliberately shifted body weight to his left leg to deliver a shoulder check on the running attacker. Mbappé fell from the contact. The on-field referee judged the contact as fair and waved play on; VAR did not intervene. On the merits, this is a missed penalty. Once the ball was past the defender via the nutmeg, the legal contest for the ball was over. The defender's deliberate body action — holding the line AND bracing to make contact — is textbook impeding-with-contact / charging without playing the ball under Law 12. Inside the penalty area, that mandates a penalty kick. WRONG NO-CALL, HIGH confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion