OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. π
France were awarded a 70th-minute penalty, converted by MbappΓ©, after DouΓ© was brought down in the box by Diego GΓ³mez; the decision was confirmed by VAR. This is correct. Paraguay claimed a dive, but the review confirmed clear contact β and a foul inside the area is a penalty regardless of how the attacker goes down. Simulation would require no contact; there was contact. CORRECT DECISION, high confidence.
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.
Discussion