OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Mbappé went down under a Morocco defender's slide in the box and France were given a penalty. This is defensible. The defender caught the man, not the ball, inside the area — a foul — and although Mbappé began going down early and sold it, embellishment does not undo a genuine foul; simulation only applies when there is no contact at all. There was fouling contact, so the penalty stands. It is soft and theatrically bought, which is why it is not clear-cut. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion