OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
England's stoppage-time goal against Norway was questioned on the suspicion that the ball had clipped the overhead camera wire and changed direction in the build-up. FIFA's Connected Ball data settles it: the sensor recorded no impact "heartbeat" while the ball was airborne, so there was no contact with the wire. This is an objective, factual determination — like goal-line technology, it is not gated by the clear-and-obvious threshold. With no outside interference, play correctly continued and the goal correctly stands. CORRECT DECISION, high confidence — backed by the Connected Ball sensor data.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion