OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
England claimed Kane was fouled in the build-up to Norway's goal, but the frames show a fair shielding duel — the Norway No. 6 reaches in with only routine contact and gets a clean touch on the ball; the goal was allowed and confirmed. This is correct. A player may shield the ball and a defender may challenge for it, and the hand-on-back jostling here is not a push, trip or hold. Above all, a goal can only be chalked off for a build-up foul that is clear and obvious, and there is nothing close to that here. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence — it flips only if a replay clearly shows the defender kicked or shoved Kane to the ground before playing the ball.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion