OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Norway scored from a corner, but a VAR review showed Haaland shoving an England player to the ground with both arms before the corner was taken; the goal was disallowed and the corner ordered retaken. This is correct on both counts. A two-handed shove is a genuine push, and the opponent falling easily does not erase it — a goal cannot stand off it. And because the offence happened while the ball was out of play, the right restart is a retaken corner, not a free kick, which is precisely what the referee gave. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence — it flips to WRONG (harsh) if the contact is read as routine two-way corner jostling rather than a clear one-sided shove, and to PARTIALLY CORRECT if a warranted caution on Haaland was missed.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion