1 / 3 today
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #3

Athletico Paranaense vs Grêmio

Brasileirão Série A · 2025/2026 · 2026-05-02 · 0-0

Partially Correct medium confidence
Red card — violent conduct
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 5 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Partially Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏

Incident
Red card — violent conduct
Law cited
Law 12 — Violent Conduct
Recommended action
Red card for the Athletico Paranaense player (correctly issued) AND red card for Grêmio #99 (missed — violent conduct, elbow/strike in the initial phase and continued aggression in the brawl)
Affected team
On-field decision
VAR upgraded to red
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

Grêmio #99 delivers a clear elbow/arm strike to the face/head of an Athletico Paranaense player near the corner flag (Frames 2–4) — ball not in play in the immediate vicinity, off-the-ball act of violence

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest — one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free →