OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
In a heated match, Matías Galarza swung an arm into Mbappé and no card was shown. This is correct: an arm or elbow is only violent conduct when it is a forceful strike, above all to the head. Here the contact was to the arm / upper body, not the head, so it falls short of a sending-off — no card is right. The line is where and how hard it lands: the same swing to the face would be a straight red. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence (hinges on the contact being the arm, not the head).
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion