⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #74
Palmeiras vs Chapecoense
Wrong
medium confidence
Be the first to vote on this verdict
Incident
Other
Law cited
Law 12 — Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Goal should stand. The arm contact during the aerial duel does not meet the Law 12 threshold of careless, reckless, or excessive force. The Chapecoense goal should have been awarded.
Referee
Affected team
On-field decision
Goal disallowed for a potential foul by attacker on defender
5 things signed-in readers see that you don't:
- Full frame-by-frame AI reasoning
- Key factors that drove the call
- Community agreement breakdown
- Comment + reply with team flair
- Discussion translated to your language
Free to read · sign up to vote and comment
