OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. π
The referee correctly sent off Paraguay's Miguel Almiron for covering his mouth while speaking to an opponent. Under the current refereeing instruction (Vini Jr / Prestianni precedent and the 2026 enforcement norm), a player who deliberately covers their mouth during a verbal exchange is treated as having said something they wanted hidden from broadcast lip-readers β either offensive/insulting/abusive language or discriminatory speech, both of which are mandatory red-card offences under Law 12. The on-field referee is not required to verify the exact words: the gesture itself is treated as conclusive evidence in a confrontation context. The AI's original "yellow at most" verdict applied an outdated reading of Law 12 that does not reflect how this offence is now policed at the elite level.
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.
Discussion