1 / 2 today Sign up free →
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #124

Uruguay vs Cape Verde

FIFA World Cup · 2025/2026 · 2026-06-21 · 2-2

Correct (No Call) high confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 4 votes needed for verdict
Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 — Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Play on (correct) — Uruguay defender's slide tackle was clean, ball clearly won before contact with the attacker
Referee
Affected team
On-field decision
No penalty given; Uruguay defender's slide tackle judged clean, play continued
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

Cape Verde counter-attacked in the closing seconds; Cape Verde #21 broke through near the Uruguay byline and was caught by Uruguay #6's recovering slide tackle. The tackle was clean — the Uruguay defender's leg got to the ball first and deflected it away, with the Cape Verde attacker going over the outstretched leg after the ball was won. Under Law 12, this is the textbook "playing the ball, not the man" scenario; the trip-over-the-tackler trajectory is normal physics for a clean slide and is NOT a foul. The referee correctly waved play on; no penalty kick was warranted. World-class recovery tackle from Uruguay's defender in a high-pressure end-of-match moment.

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion