OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
At 0-0, Lautaro Martínez was double-tackled by two Austrian defenders inside the box. The on-field referee initially waved play on — no PK. VAR reviewed the incident, identified a clear and obvious missed foul, and recommended an On-Field Review (OFR). The referee went to the monitor, reviewed the angles, and overturned his initial decision — awarding a penalty kick to Argentina. Messi missed the resulting spot kick. The PK award is correct under Law 12 + Law 14: the double-tackle pattern means each defender's contact is judged independently, and the second Austrian defender's foot-on-foot contact on Lautaro's planted boot is a foul regardless of any clean ball-play by the other defender. The VAR intervention is the protocol working as designed — a missed on-field call corrected after independent review by both VAR and the on-field official viewing the monitor angles. CORRECT DECISION, HIGH confidence.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion