1 / 3 today
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #44

Al-Hilal vs Western Sydney Wanderers

AFC Champions League · 2014-11-01 · 0-0

Correct (No Call) medium confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 4 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct (No Call). You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏

Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Play on - referee correctly allowed play to continue. Ball-first tackle, attacker not brought down.
Affected team
On-field decision
Play on (no penalty)
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

Match identified from scoreboard (HIL 0-0 WSW, time 44:43): Al-Hilal vs Western Sydney Wanderers, AFC Champions League 2014 Final 1st leg, King Fahd International Stadium, 25 Oct 2014. Pre-VAR era; per the laws in force at the time.

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest — one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free →