3 / 3 today Sign up free β†’
βš– VAR Verdict Β· Case #44

Al-Hilal vs Western Sydney Wanderers

AFC Champions League Β· 2014-11-01 Β· 0-0

Correct (No Call) medium confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
πŸ—³οΈ Community verdict β€” vote now 4 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct (No Call). You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β€” not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β€” and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. πŸ™

Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Play on - referee correctly allowed play to continue. Ball-first tackle, attacker not brought down.
Affected team
On-field decision
Play on (no penalty)
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it β€” we review every submission.
Suggest a clip β†’

Match identified from scoreboard (HIL 0-0 WSW, time 44:43): Al-Hilal vs Western Sydney Wanderers, AFC Champions League 2014 Final 1st leg, King Fahd International Stadium, 25 Oct 2014. Pre-VAR era; per the laws in force at the time.

πŸ”’ Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

πŸ”’ PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β€” and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest β€” one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free β†’