1 / 3 today
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #52

Machida Zelvia vs Urawa Red Diamonds

J1 League · 2025/2026 · 2026-05-22 · 1-0

Wrong (No Call) medium confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 5 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Wrong (No Call). You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏

Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 — Pushing/Charging an opponent
Recommended action
Penalty kick to Urawa Red Diamonds
Affected team
On-field decision
Play on (no penalty)
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

Machida Zelvia #3 makes sustained upper-body contact with the Urawa Red Diamonds striker across multiple frames (frames 14–18), visibly pressing into the attacker's torso/arm area from behind and to the side

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest — one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free →