2 / 3 today Sign up free β†’
βš– VAR Verdict Β· Case #54

Mirassol FC vs Fluminense

BrasileirΓ£o SΓ©rie A Β· 2025/2026 Β· 2026-05-23 Β· 1-0

Correct medium confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
πŸ—³οΈ Community verdict β€” vote now 5 votes needed for verdict

OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right β€” not on the referee.

Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?

Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy β€” and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. πŸ™

Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 β€” Direct Free Kick offences
Recommended action
No penalty β€” restart in favour of Mirassol FC; no foul established inside the penalty area
Affected team
On-field decision
VAR overturned to no penalty
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it β€” we review every submission.
Suggest a clip β†’

Frames 11–13 show brief, mutual physical contact between a Mirassol FC outfield player (yellow) and the Fluminense attacker in a crowded penalty-area scramble β€” no single, identifiable, forceful push or sustained hold is visible

πŸ”’ Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

πŸ”’ PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' β€” and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month Β· WC 50 Β· GB 150.

Discussion

You're posting as a guest β€” one comment per discussion. Sign in to post more and comment under your name: Sign up free β†’