⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #60
São Paulo FC vs Boston River
Wrong
medium confidence
Be the first to vote on this verdict
Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 11 — Offside
Recommended action
Penalty to São Paulo FC should stand. The foul occurred before the attacker played or attempted to play the ball, so under Law 11 the foul (not the offside) is the offence — VAR was wrong to overturn to offside, and the defender's caution should also stand.
Referee
Affected team
On-field decision
VAR overturned to no penalty
5 things signed-in readers see that you don't:
- Full frame-by-frame AI reasoning
- Key factors that drove the call
- Community agreement breakdown
- Comment + reply with team flair
- Discussion translated to your language
Free to read · sign up to vote and comment
