1 / 2 today Sign up free →
⚖ VAR Verdict · Case #129

Norway vs Senegal

FIFA World Cup · 2025/2026 · 2026-06-22 · 3-2

Correct (No Call) medium confidence
Penalty (push/hold in box)
🗳️ Community verdict — vote now 5 votes needed for verdict
Incident
Penalty (push/hold in box)
Law cited
Law 12 — Fouls and Misconduct
Recommended action
Play on (correct) — contact reads as fair shoulder-to-shoulder body-jostle with arm for balance, not a clear foul
Affected team
On-field decision
No penalty; play continued; no VAR intervention
🎬 Spot another clip we missed? Suggest it — we review every submission.
Suggest a clip →

A Senegalese attacker came into contact with a Norwegian defender and went to ground; Senegal claimed a penalty kick. The on-field referee waved play on. VAR ran the standard PK-claim check and did not recommend intervention. From the broadcast angles available, the contact reads as fair shoulder-to-shoulder body-jostling with arm involvement consistent with running balance — not a clear foul-from-behind or a push. Under Law 12, the attacker going to ground is not by itself evidence of a foul; the action of the defender is what determines the call. The no-call is consistent with both the legal merits of the contact and the broader WC2026 officiating trend toward higher PK thresholds — letting borderline body contests resolve without a whistle rather than rewarding contact-and-fall with a penalty. CORRECT NO-CALL, MEDIUM confidence.

🔒 Premium

Read the full OURVAR breakdown

Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.

Ask OURVAR

🔒 PREMIUM

Have a question about this verdict?

Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.

Discussion