OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
Around the 10th minute at 0-0, a Norway defender slid in on Brazil's No. 9 in the penalty area and brought him down; after a VAR review the referee gave a penalty. This is correct. A sliding tackle is legal only if it wins the ball, and here the defender caught the man, not the ball — a trip in the area is a penalty. VAR checked and confirmed it. CORRECT DECISION, medium confidence, the only caveat being whether the defender got a decisive touch on the ball first, which is not apparent.
Read the full OURVAR breakdown
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
- Key factors that drove the AI's call
- Full IFAB law citations + frame references
- Vote, comment, and discuss with other fans
Ask OURVAR
Have a question about this verdict?
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion