OURVAR judged the referee's decision: Correct. You're voting on whether OURVAR's analysis is right — not on the referee.
Do you agree with OURVAR's verdict?
Every vote helps sharpen OURVAR's accuracy — and we're grateful for it. The AI isn't infallible, and your verdict is exactly what improves it, case by case. You're helping build the VAR we all deserve. 🙏
From a Mexican goal kick, the ball flicked off Kane's arm and ran to Gordon, who was clear on goal and brought down by keeper Rangel; Faghani gave a penalty. This is correct on all three checks: no offside is possible from a goal kick; Kane's arm is non-punishable (short range, no added movement, no unnatural silhouette); and the keeper's late challenge on Gordon is a clear foul in the box. CORRECT DECISION, high confidence.
Sign up to see every key factor, the IFAB law clauses cited, and the frame-by-frame reasoning that led to this verdict.
Push back on the verdict. Ask the AI 'why?', 'what about the elbow angle?', 'what's the precedent?' — and get IFAB-grounded answers from the same model that called the case. Pro 25/month · WC 50 · GB 150.
Discussion